RE: FrEaKy! Batch work runs under interactive job, but doesn't tie up the interactive job...

["Dan Bale" <dbale@xxxxxxxxx>]

>> So, how can we utilize this feature?  Or is this an IBM-only doo-dad?
>
>wrksplf from the job that runs SST. You can CPYSPLF to a normal
>physical file between each dump.

No, I meant to ask if there was a way we could do this kind of magic with
our own programs.  Like a user taking an option to print an invoice, or some
other type of batch process, and it runs in the background of the current
interactive job.  Opens up some interesting possibilities.

- Dan Bale
(I am *NOT* "Dale"
http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l/200105/msg00281.html )
SAMSA, Inc.
989-790-0507
DBale@SAMSA.com <mailto:DBale@SAMSA.com>
  Quiquid latine dictum sit altum viditur.
  (Whatever is said in Latin seems profound.)