RE: DDM experiences

["Kevin Monahan" <kevin.monahan@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

We used to use them when we had 2 production machines, and had no problems.
They were quite simple to use and worked well on 2 620 machines.  We now have
them on a 170 test box piping
to an 820 machine, and there is a little performance hit, but not too serious.

Kevin Monahan
Sr Programmer/Analyst
JL Hammett Co
781-848-1000 x1114
www.hammett.com


> -----Original Message-----
> From: midrange-l-admin@midrange.com
> [mailto:midrange-l-admin@midrange.com]On Behalf Of
> Karen.Eder@idealindustries.com
> Sent: Thursday, June 06, 2002 2:59 PM
> To: midrange-l@midrange.com
> Subject: DDM experiences
>
>
>
> I am looking for some feedback and/or experiences with DDM files.  My
> previous experience using them was so-so and at least 8 years ago or so.
> Coworkers here have mixed opinions so I thought I'd see what this group had
> to say.  If any of you can offer any feedback, I sure would appreciate it.
>
> In case there are any recent major enhancements in this area, currently our
> systems are all running at 4.5; but if 5.1 had great improvements in this
> area, it could be considered.
>
> Thanks, Karen
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> This is the Midrange Systems Technical Discussion (MIDRANGE-L) mailing list
> To post a message email: MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com
> To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
> visit: http://lists.midrange.com/cgi-bin/listinfo/midrange-l
> or email: MIDRANGE-L-request@midrange.com
> Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
> at http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l.
>
>