RE: RPG400 vs. RPG ILE -- MIDRANGE-L

Subject: RE: RPG400 vs. RPG ILE
From: Buck Calabro <Buck.Calabro@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 7 Jun 2002 13:20:18 -0400
List-archive: <http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l/>
List-help: <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=help>
List-id: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion <midrange-l.midrange.com>
List-post: <mailto:midrange-l@midrange.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/cgi-bin/listinfo/midrange-l>,<mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/cgi-bin/listinfo/midrange-l>,<mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=unsubscribe>

>Can somebody tell me if there are some
>advantages of programs RPG ILE vs. RPG400
>- speaking on the executable object level?
>Are RPGLE programs faster, or something
>like this?

On a RISC box (V4 and higher) I have seen RPG IV programs run between 10%
and 15% faster, just by doing a CVTRPGSRC and compiling.  Your software may
behave differently than the mix of programs that I have here.  I would run
some of the Genexus RPG source through CVTRPGPGM and compile it in the
default activation group.  Benchmark the RPG IV code over your data and see
what performance changes happen.
  --buck

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

Follow-Ups:

RE: RPG400 vs. RPG ILE , Dan Bale

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.