Re: upgrade frequency (was RE: Since when is adding DASD so difficult?) -- MIDRANGE-L

Subject: Re: upgrade frequency (was RE: Since when is adding DASD so difficult?)
From: pam@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Date: Fri, 7 Jun 2002 16:34:03 -0400
List-archive: <http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l/>
List-help: <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=help>
List-id: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion <midrange-l.midrange.com>
List-post: <mailto:midrange-l@midrange.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/cgi-bin/listinfo/midrange-l>,<mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/cgi-bin/listinfo/midrange-l>,<mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=unsubscribe>

I have no problem with the frequency of new releases. I do resent being forced
off a perfectly good release, though I realize that all vendors resist
providing support for "old" software.



                    rob@dekko.com
                    Sent by:                   To:     midrange-l@midrange.com
                    midrange-l-admin@mi        cc:
                    drange.com                 Subject:     upgrade frequency 
(was RE: Since when is adding DASD so
                                               difficult?)

                    06/06/2002 05:17 PM
                    Please respond to
                    midrange-l






What is wrong with IBM's upgrade frequency?
Do you feel that it is happening too often?

Follow-Ups:

RE: upgrade frequency (was RE: Since when is adding DASD so difficult?) , Chris Whisonant

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2026 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.