Defining our printers as TCP/IP and hooking them up to the ethernet,
(either directly or via a MarkNet box), has worked quite well for us.
Numerous iSeries, and wintel clients and servers all access them
independently of each other.  You're not relying on one iSeries being up
for the other's printer to work.

Rob Berendt
--
"They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary
safety deserve neither liberty nor safety."
Benjamin Franklin



                    Mike.Crump@saint-go
                    bain.com                  To:     midrange-l@midrange.com
                    Sent by:                  cc:
                    midrange-l-admin@mi       Fax to:
                    drange.com                Subject:     Printer Pass-thru 
(TCP/IP vs. SNA)


                    08/13/2002 12:09 PM
                    Please respond to
                    midrange-l






We currently have an environment where we move print from a corporate
AS/400 to ours via a high speed multi-protocol connection.  We use the
process lightly and have always configured the remote OUTQ's as SNA.
However, recently we have had numerous issues with SNA traffic on our
network.  So far the network gods have admitted to no problems but we now
routinely have SNA outages that are in the hours range.  It's not really
mine to solve so I've stayed out of it and this is not the intent of my
question.

Shortly, hourly plant payroll checks will be coming across this connection.
And I can smell the disaster coming.  I have no true vested interest in the
SNA connection.  We used it starting years ago because it was what we used
locally and everyone was comfortable with it.  I've not pushed migration of
certain applications towards TCP/IP since our network supports both
(normally quite well) and the telcom people haven't pushed the issue.
Therefore, I only want to take the task on if it is necessary.

My question is that I'd like to know what issues exist if any between
sending print from AS/400 to AS/400 via TCP/IP vs. SNA?  The print being
transferred from them is plain vanilla (standard SCS).  I'm sure that there
are a few people that have changed their method from SNA to TCP/IP and
would like to get their perspective on performance, functionality,
ownership, attributes, etc.



Michael Crump
Saint-Gobain Containers
1509 S. Macedonia Ave.
Muncie, IN  47302
(765)741-7696
(765)741-7012 f
(800)428-8642

mailto:mike.crump@saint-gobain.com




_______________________________________________
This is the Midrange Systems Technical Discussion (MIDRANGE-L) mailing list
To post a message email: MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: http://lists.midrange.com/cgi-bin/listinfo/midrange-l
or email: MIDRANGE-L-request@midrange.com
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
at http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l.







As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...


Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.