|
----- Original Message -----
From: "William A.(Tony) Corbett" <corbett@ASRESOURCES.COM>
To: "MIDRANGE-L@midrange. com" <MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com>
Sent: Thursday, August 22, 2002 9:05 AM
Subject: Allow *ZERO in a date (and timestamp) field? IBM?
> If the "date field restrictions" could be eased up to allow only valid
dates
> (as it is now) OR zero in a date field, this would help us a lot.
>
> I am currently having to using a packed field to store dates on the db,
> primarily due to this restriction. Oftentimes, I need to allow a zero in
a
> date field, and current restrictions will not allow this.
while I understand the wish, it is not likely to ever be changed. And I
think "help us" is a key mentality here... it sure won't help the developers
that follow us.
One should never use a value to represent a "no value" condition and that's
what you are doing. A null value is what is used to represent that
condition. Since nulls are viable in date fields, you would/should convert
your dates and null those dates that are zero.
And, yes, application code would all have to change then too.
===========================================================
R. Bruce Hoffman, Jr.
-- IBM Certified Specialist - iSeries Administrator
-- IBM Certified Specialist - RPG IV Developer
"There is a crack in everything,
that's how the light gets in.
- Leonard Cohen
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2025 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.