|
From: Nathan M. Andelin <nandelin@RELATIONAL-DATA.COM> > > From: <Chris.Whisonant@comporium.com> > > The dilemma is whether to stick with our 240 CPW or > > pay our fair share of the "tax" and step up to 560 CPW. > My understanding is that while CPU speed may vary from one model to the > next, CPW is supposed to be a fairly constant measurement of capacity across > all models. 240 CPW may represent 50% of CPU utilization on one box, but > only 25% of CPU utilization on another. On a box with a faster processor, > the interactive governor just kicks in at a lower utilization threshold. this is correct. You don't get more interactive processing by buying a faster box.
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2025 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.
midrange.com
