|
Yeah - plan is to get v5r2 adn still have a v5r1 machine for v4r4 At 01:51 PM 9/6/02 -0700, you wrote:
Makes sense, but why V4R4 ? (V5R1 dev system ?) ----- Original Message ----- From: "Vernon Hamberg" <vhamberg@attbi.com> To: <midrange-l@midrange.com> Sent: Friday, September 06, 2002 1:15 PM Subject: RE: OS400 release levels > Our first product, CD-ROM Studio, works back to V3R7, so we have a V3R7 170 > just for that. We own it, so it's not a big deal. The product is pretty > mature and does not need much in new stuff.. Our newer stuff is baiscally > V4R4 and up.
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.