Yeah - plan is to get v5r2 adn still have a v5r1 machine for v4r4

At 01:51 PM 9/6/02 -0700, you wrote:
Makes sense, but why V4R4 ?  (V5R1 dev system ?)


----- Original Message -----
From: "Vernon Hamberg" <vhamberg@attbi.com>
To: <midrange-l@midrange.com>
Sent: Friday, September 06, 2002 1:15 PM
Subject: RE: OS400 release levels


> Our first product, CD-ROM Studio, works back to V3R7, so we have a V3R7
170
> just for that. We own it, so it's not a big deal. The product is pretty
> mature and does not need much in new stuff.. Our newer stuff is baiscally
> V4R4 and up.


As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.