Re: Applying ptf's with IPL *FULL -- MIDRANGE-L

Subject: Re: Applying ptf's with IPL *FULL
From: Pat Barber <mboceanside@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 19 Sep 2002 15:19:10 -0400
List-archive: <http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l/>
List-help: <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=help>
List-id: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion <midrange-l.midrange.com>
List-post: <mailto:midrange-l@midrange.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/cgi-bin/listinfo/midrange-l>,<mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/cgi-bin/listinfo/midrange-l>,<mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=unsubscribe>

That option has been the default for many years and I suspect that
faulty ptf's are a bigger problem than performing the hardware test,
which I have always suggested.


rob@dekko.com wrote:

Why not do the *FULL and get the hardware testing.  It's on a weekend,
so if
something dies IBM will rush to the rescue, and we'll have plenty of
time.

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.