Have separate source members. It did not used to be necessary, but
nowadays, because of record lengths, it is. RPGLE needs a record length of
112,  older RPG needs 92. QMQRY's need 91, QMFORMs need 162 or some such.

I would still use distinct names, even in separate source files, since the
resulting objects, whether modules or programs or service programs, still
need distinct names. This gives you the chance to make names that reflect
the original source types - might be useful.

Regards

Vern

At 10:25 AM 10/3/02 -0400, you wrote:
Rusty,

1)  At our shop we keep the objects and data in separate libraries
    in the event we need to do special restores/backups. Our source
    files are also stored in the object library.

2)  We also keep all of our source code in a singe source-PF.
    This does mean you should have a solid naming convention
    for all of your member types so that they can be resident
    in the same source file.  What I like about this is that
    you can use PDM to see *all* of your source in the list at
    one time.

Good Luck,
Terry


As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.