Re: locked record

[Scott Klement <klemscot@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

When I originally wrote my routine, I was going to use the same approach
(justing checking the PSDS) but there was some reason (which I can no
longer remember) why I converted to use the message queue.

I may simply have been that the positions in the PSDS are intended to be
"free form data" and not guarenteed to always be there and never change...
but like I said, I don't remember.

After waiting 30 seconds for a record lock to fail, the time my routine
took was insignificant to me :)


On Thu, 10 Oct 2002 rob@dekko.com wrote:
>
> Thank you.  This looks good.
>
> Scott, your code was good also, but this will probably be clearer and a
> better performer.
>
> Rob Berendt