Re: SQL VS QUERY

[rob@xxxxxxxxx]

This is a multipart message in MIME format.
--
[ Picked text/plain from multipart/alternative ]
Honestly, you might have a point there.  But I haven't played with STRQM
enough to give it a fair shake.  I, like others, can sometimes be a
creature of habit.  If I have Query, I'll use it because that is what I am
used to.

Rob Berendt
--
"They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary
safety deserve neither liberty nor safety."
Benjamin Franklin




Evan Harris <spanner@ihug.co.nz>
Sent by: midrange-l-admin@midrange.com
10/11/2002 02:33 PM
Please respond to midrange-l


        To:     midrange-l@midrange.com
        cc:
        Fax to:
        Subject:        Re: SQL VS QUERY


Rob

you don't consider the report layout tools an advantage ?


>This is a multipart message in MIME format.
>--
>[ Picked text/plain from multipart/alternative ]
>The only advantage that Query ever had over SQL was the ability to direct
>mail merge with OV/400.  Since OV/400 went the way of the dodo bird that
>is not a concern anymore.  When you have SQL you also get STRQM.  Which
>can be configured to work like Query, or like SQL.
>
>Rob Berendt

_______________________________________________
This is the Midrange Systems Technical Discussion (MIDRANGE-L) mailing
list
To post a message email: MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: http://lists.midrange.com/cgi-bin/listinfo/midrange-l
or email: MIDRANGE-L-request@midrange.com
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
at http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l.