Re: V5R2: Source now allowed in the IFS -- MIDRANGE-L

Subject: Re: V5R2: Source now allowed in the IFS
From: James Rich <james@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2002 09:19:37 -0600 (MDT)
List-archive: <http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l/>
List-help: <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=help>
List-id: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion <midrange-l.midrange.com>
List-post: <mailto:midrange-l@midrange.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/cgi-bin/listinfo/midrange-l>,<mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/cgi-bin/listinfo/midrange-l>,<mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=unsubscribe>

On Tue, 15 Oct 2002, Al Barsa wrote:

> I was at the Inge Weiss session yesterday where she indicated that source
> can be put into the IFS, but the IFS is SO inefficient a user of space, why
> would I ever want to ever want to waste that disk space?  (PS:  This
> observation was taken in the V4R4 time frame/)

Because now I can store my source on an NFS exported filesystem and use a
real change management system on it.  Or use any editor I like. Or...

James Rich

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

Follow-Ups:

Re: V5R2: Source now allowed in the IFS , Steve Landess

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.