Re: LCKW Problem

["Carel Teijgeler" <coteijgeler@xxxxxxxxx>]

Kevin,

Have you tried in WRKACTJOB:

option 11 for the job with status LCKW
press F10
option 5 for the file with status WAIT.

or

option 5 for the job with status LCKW
option 10 and F10, then F18, see last messages.

Regards,
Carel Teijgeler

*********** REPLY SEPARATOR  ***********

On 24-10-02 at 12:12 Brunk, Kevin wrote:

>We experienced a problem today that I've not encountered before.  A job
>was running and entered a LCKW state (as shown on WRKACTJOB) and stayed in
>that state for a long time.  So long, in fact, that I ended up ENDJOB
>*IMMED and then eventually needed to use ENDJOBABN.
>
>What confounds me is that I was unable to determine what resource the job
>was waiting on.  When I displayed job record locks, there were none.  I
>tried using the WRKOBJLCK from the job's list of locks and besides being
>tedious, I was still unable to identify a resource for which the job was
>waiting.  I also used WRKACTJOB and scanned the job lists to see if any
>other jobs were in an unusual state that might have been causing the
>conflict (especially the QDBSRVxx jobs) - and found none.  Finally, I used
>DSPLOG to see if the system was reporting any messages like damaged
>objects or such - again, nothing reported (I also check DSPMSG QSYSOPR).
>Interestingly, there were no other user-submitted "batch" jobs running at
>the time - so I couldn't blame it on a query building an index!
>
>As soon as the job was ended, other queued jobs which ran the same
>programs and accessed the same files began running and continued without
>incident.