|
Dennis The matter of "Daylight Savings Time awareness" was much discussed fairly recently. I guess se didn't have much to do back in June ;-) The main issue, as I understand it, is time-dependent processes. ROBOT, for one, should be shut down, then the change made, then restarted, so that you don't either miss or double-run something. Vern At 07:40 AM 10/25/02 -0400, you wrote:
This is one of the areas I find amusing about the AS/400 system. It's amusing only because it's easily overcome and not really in the nuisance category. I am not aware of any other system where both UTC offset and local time must both be specified for proper operation (you only need one of these if the internal time is maintained at GMT)... and also aware of no other system that isn't "Daylight Savings Time aware." (oh, I take that back.... IBM mainframes suffer from the same shortsightedness. And DOS from back when the earth was still cooling.) I keep thinking that one day IBM will wake up and resolve this, but then what would I have to complain about two times every year? Of course, I could always move back home to Indiana, where they don't bother with such nonsense.... hmmm.... :) Dennis
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.