On Fri, 25 Oct 2002, Mark A. Manske wrote:

> I like this in theory - practice and implementations could be rough -
>
> The only other thing I would add is the following -
> Your database would have to keep track of the "offset"
> from the QTIME data to take into account where you where
> at the time the record was created as compared to the
> "software"/real world clock - since we all run reports
> on data that crossed the DST boundaries.

No, you wouldn't.  That what the unix APIs do (or should, given the right
info).  Probably something like gettimeofday().  You give it the QTIME
data and the APIs know what the corresponding wall clock time would have
been (or will be).

James Rich



As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Follow-Ups:
Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.