|
From: <steven.ryan@denso.com.au> > >but I grant that if you don't have a need for > >security there is benefit to dispensing with it... > If the expense of having security is not justified by the value of what you > are securing, then you shouldn't have that security in the first place. > Similarly, the expense/savings in increasing/decreasing security is vital > in justify any such decisions. > I think that is precisely (well, approximately) what I said, no?
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.
midrange.com
