RE: Beginner's Question

["DeLong, Eric" <EDeLong@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Well, maybe if they're going to do the work, could we also ask for UTC
offset at the job level too?  I can't say how many times the users in
different time zones have beat me up on the clock issue.  Can of worms?
Yup..... OS400 would need to use GMT internally, and have QUTCOFFSET to
designate system time (used for journaling, messaging, scheduling, etc), and
JOBUTCOFF for job local time.

Eric DeLong
Sally Beauty Company
MIS-Project Manager (BSG)
940-898-7863 or ext. 1863



> -----Original Message-----
> From: Al Barsa [mailto:barsa@barsaconsulting.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, October 29, 2002 8:45 AM
> To: midrange-l@midrange.com
> Subject: RE: Beginner's Question
>
>
>
> Particularly for the purposes of inter-computer
> communications, you want to
> have QUTCOFFSET set correctly, however most customers never
> change it.  If
> it becomes "read only", another interface into the system
> presumably would
> change it.
>
> There has been a standing request for the system to do
> "automatic daylight
> savings time" like Windoze does, so I might presume that this
> would all be
> wrapped together.
>
> If IBM takes on the project of system time modernization on
> the 400, this
> would yet be another sign that the 400 is here to stay.
> Unfortunately,
> because the IBM's marketing strategy for the system has been
> code named
> "the cone of silence", this will also go as unnoticed to the
> remainder of
> the industry as was CISC to RISC, the IFS and other significant
> modernization improvements.
>
> Al
>
> Al Barsa, Jr.
> Barsa Consulting Group, LLC
>
> 400>390
>
> 914-251-1234
> 914-251-9406 fax
>
> http://www.barsaconsulting.com
> http://www.taatool.com