|
This is a multipart message in MIME format. -- [ Picked text/plain from multipart/alternative ] Strive for excellence, not perfection. Excellence is attainable - perfection isn't. Rob Berendt -- "They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety." Benjamin Franklin "Michael Naughton" <mnaughton@juddwire.com> Sent by: midrange-l-admin@midrange.com 10/30/2002 02:06 PM Please respond to midrange-l To: midrange-l@midrange.com cc: Fax to: Subject: Re: RE: RE: Not knowing My take is just a little different -- I don't think the problem is that programmers know just enough to get by; the problem is that standards for "getting by" have gotten so low. If programs that kept breaking and needing to be fixed were considered unacceptable, then programmers who wanted to remain programmers would need to learn how to avoid producing them. (Again, this is a common problem -- if business leaders who acted like crooks were punished instead of rewarded, fewer of them would do so; if politicians who failed to deliver on their promises were voted out of office, they would stop saying anything to get elected; etc.) Clearly, some people on this list have very high standards for "getting by" as programmers. IMHO, that's a good thing, but I also think that the history of the world shows us that you don't need to have the highest standards to still be successful (by whatever means you want to measure). I'm not saying that's the way I would have done things if I had created the universe, but I think that's the way it is. And how many of us would choose to forego in our lives all of the things that haven't been produced by "absolutely the best" process? midrange-l@midrange.com writes: >I believe that I, and many others on this list, would STRONGLY disagree >with >this sentiment: "on the whole I think a case can be made that the world >in >general has benefitted from the fact that so many people can now use >computers for so many things -- in large part because of programmers who >knew just enough to get by". > >Many would view this as the PROBLEM with software production today. > >The old saw, "There's never enough time to do it right, but always seems >to >be enough time to go back and fix it" is, unfortunately, all too easy... >KISS gets a lot of lip service, imv... Mike Naughton Senior Programmer/Analyst Judd Wire, Inc. 124 Turnpike Road Turners Falls, MA 01376 413-863-4357 x444 mnaughton@juddwire.com _______________________________________________ This is the Midrange Systems Technical Discussion (MIDRANGE-L) mailing list To post a message email: MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options, visit: http://lists.midrange.com/cgi-bin/listinfo/midrange-l or email: MIDRANGE-L-request@midrange.com Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives at http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l.
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.