|
Hi Martin I suppose one reason is, less typing. I like the flexibility of NAMEFMT 1 but weary of the extra typing for LIB/OBJ stuff. And you always need to put in a QUO SIT NAM 1 to be sure you can do it. And you're right, it does not do IFS. Regards Vern At 04:01 PM 11/16/02 +0000, you wrote:
:) I only ever use namefmt 1, so I hadn't realised that 'shortcut' doesn't exist in namefmt 0. What reasons are there to use 0 over 1 - it seems too limiting to me, particularly as (I assume) you can't do IFS stuff with it. Regards, Martin
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2025 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.
midrange.com
