|
Yes, but you still can end up with additional unnecessary disk accesses
when that happens.
To clarify my point, I actually did see a new programmer create a file
with a record length of 260 once - but the real killer was they had added
a 10 byte "filler" field to the end of what was actually only 250 bytes of
data. ;-)
...Neil
PaulMmn <PaulMmn@ix.netcom.com>
To: midrange-l@midrange.com
cc:
Subject: Re: Odd/Even packed numbers.
I haven't worried about file record lengths (or pack maps, for that
matter) since we converted from the S/360/20/5 to the S/3/15-- which
knew how to span records of strange length across sector boundaries.
--Paul E Musselman
PaulMmn@ix.netcom.nospam.com
>True - but I still cringe when I see some new programmer create a new
file
>with a record length like 257 ! ;-)
>
>...Neil
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2025 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.