|
From: jt <jt@ee.net> > | forcing the vendor to do it). Security by obscurity is false > | security. Now, how many times do I have to say this? > > We'll probably hafta agree to disagree, in part, Leif... SURE, 400 security > could be improved by having eyes outside IBMers looking over the code. > (Don't know that'll ever happen.. but, to me anyway, trying to "force" the > vendor to do any given thing doesn't seem to be a step in a direction that > would help.) > it sure did help when the "passwords in clear" arose and I'm told there is even a "Leif bit" in the MSR for the newest (or coming) machines to help improve security....
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.
midrange.com
