|
Steve Landess wrote: > If you re-read my message, you'll see that I said "running V5R1M0, > with cum SF99510". > > Now, go to IBM's iPTF web site: > which has the table of recommended fixes. You'll see that I was only > using the terminology given by IBM. It says "CUM Package" on the > left-hand side. > > Sorry if I was a little touchy, but I don't think I was wrong... Steve, In this case you are incorrect. SF99510 is the "signal" to the PTF process that the orderer wishes to obtain the latest CUM for OS/400 version 5.1.0 . Stating you are on the latest CUM and referencing that PTF signaler is misleading and meaningless. Bill
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2026 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.