|
Maybe it shows ibm in front of the end of the proprietary model. imho -- Stephane Le samedi, 11 jan 2003, à 16:32 Europe/Zurich, Leif Svalgaard a écrit :
From: Al Barsa <barsa@barsaconsulting.com>IMHO, the interactive tax was a misguided thought that IBM had to try (and
failed) to make people push to client server. As it made the platform
uncompetitive, IBM dumbed up and did away with it.
but Al, you used to say that WITHOUT the interactive tax, the AS/400 was UNPROFITABLE and since IBM was in it for the money, the AS/400 would die. Not the same thing. I don't disagree with your statement above. It shows great moral clarity.
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2025 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.
midrange.com
