|
Hello, I'm currently looking at reducing our memory pools. We currently have the following wrksyssts: 30.01.03 16:51:08 % CPU used . . . . . . . : 34,9 System ASP . . . . . . . : 193,0 G % DB capability . . . . : 18,6 % system ASP used . . . : 81,7213 Elapsed time . . . . . . : 00:04:07 Total aux stg . . . . . : 210,5 G Jobs in system . . . . . : 12673 Current unprotect used . : 4507 M % perm addresses . . . . : 0,024 Maximum unprotect . . . : 5890 M % temp addresses . . . . : 0,735 Sys Pool Reserved Max Paging Pool Size M Size M Act Pool Subsystem Library Option 1 598,97 193,16 +++++ *MACHINE *FIXED 2 1345,82 0,33 137 *BASE *FIXED 3 250,00 0,00 15 *SPOOL *FIXED 4 25,92 0,00 1 2 MSGCTL CV00C00 *FIXED 5 330,40 0,00 20 2 AUFTRAG CV00C00 *FIXED 6 120,86 0,00 10 2 IT CV00C00 *FIXED 7 50,00 0,00 5 2 GCINTER CV00C00 *FIXED 8 330,00 0,00 20 2 AUFTRAGWJ CV00C00 *FIXED 10 20,00 0,00 10 2 RPSBSW130 SYLASW130 *FIXED Bottom Can I just shift everything to *BASE or will this get me problems? We have heavy batch-processing, should I put these into a different pool? Or generally seperate batch from interactive? Currently, we have no performance problems, but I want to cleanup. Thanks, OLiver
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.