Re: Aldon stuff

["David Gibbs" <david@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

"E Doc" <doc6502@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:20030325151258.52195.qmail@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >Why do you need to remove the binding directory entry?  The binding
> >directory is just that, a directory (unless I've misunderstood your
> >requirement).
> The main reason is that we'll be re-deploying these apps in different
> configurations to different branches.  As such, the order of the objects
in the
> binding directory may change.

Ok, I'm kind of confused here ... if you want the binding directories
managed by your SCM product, then you apparently want a standardized binding
directory ... but you also state that you want the apps bound in different
configurations for each location?

How and why are you using binding directories to control configuration
options?  Wouldn't it be better to use program control?

I think there's something I am missing here.

david