|
Carel Teijgeler wrote: > Bill, > > it seems IIM@ is an LF, base on a PF ( IPI100IM ?) that has not been > restored yet. Restores are done alphabetically. Nope, IIM@ is a physical. What is interesting is that the two reasons listed in the informational message for this occurrance are the same. Bill
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2026 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.