RE: WRKNETF vs CPF8070-Not allowed to process files for user xxxxxxx.

[rob@xxxxxxxxx]

I don't know why I didn't think of that.  Lately I've been finding so MANY 
things that adopted authority doesn't work on perhaps I just got honked 
with that.

Rob Berendt
-- 
"They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary 
safety deserve neither liberty nor safety." 
Benjamin Franklin 




"Eduard van den Braken" <e.vd.braken@xxxxxxxxx>
Sent by: midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx
04/15/2003 02:54 PM
Please respond to Midrange Systems Technical Discussion
 
        To:     "'Midrange Systems Technical Discussion'" 
<midrange-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
        cc: 
        Fax to: 
        Subject:        RE: WRKNETF vs CPF8070-Not allowed to process 
files for user xxxxxxx.


Rob

I had the same problem some years ago, killed the problem by making a
frontend to the wrknetf with adopted authority.

Groetjes (Greetings)
===========================================================
Name: Eduard van den Braken
E-mail: e.vd.braken@xxxxxxxxx
Town: Leusden -- the Netherlands
Homepage: http://home.hccnet.nl/e.vd.braken/
===========================================================


-----Oorspronkelijk bericht-----
Van: midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx] Namens rob@xxxxxxxxx
Verzonden: dinsdag 15 april 2003 17:05
Aan: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion
Onderwerp: WRKNETF vs CPF8070-Not allowed to process files for user 
xxxxxxx.


We had a user who formerly had *ALLOBJ authority.  They used to work with 
EDI.  Data was sent to the divisions with SNADS and they could do a 
WRKNETF to see what was stacked up for the remote user.  They no longer 
have *ALLOBJ authority.  Now when they do a WRKNETF user they get CPF8070 
and it says that they need security officer authority.  However that is a 
lie.  *ALLOBJ works fine.  I thought I'd try the shotgun approach and then 

clean the blood up later by giving them *ALL authority to the user profile 

in question.  That didn't work.  Anyone know what object they really need 
access to?  Job log doesn't seem to show any detail whatsoever regardless 
of the logging level.

Is there a way to security journal a single job?

Rob Berendt
-- 
"They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary 
safety deserve neither liberty nor safety." 
Benjamin Franklin 
_______________________________________________
This is the Midrange Systems Technical Discussion (MIDRANGE-L) mailing 
list
To post a message email: MIDRANGE-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx To subscribe, 
unsubscribe,
or change list options,
visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo.cgi/midrange-l
or email: MIDRANGE-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
at http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l.




_______________________________________________
This is the Midrange Systems Technical Discussion (MIDRANGE-L) mailing 
list
To post a message email: MIDRANGE-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo.cgi/midrange-l
or email: MIDRANGE-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
at http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l.