|
On Wed, 11 Jun 2003, Andy Nolen-Parkhouse wrote: > There really are only two things to do. First, you can find a way to > decrease the interactive workload by scheduling your work differently or > finding the user who is running batch jobs interactively. If you have > programmers who do interactive compiles for instance. The second option > is to purchase additional interactive capacity, which can be very > expensive. There are more than two things to do, one is fast/400 and another is change platforms. Those last two options may not be desireable, however. James Rich
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2025 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.
midrange.com
