|
On Wed, 11 Jun 2003, Andy Nolen-Parkhouse wrote: > There really are only two things to do. First, you can find a way to > decrease the interactive workload by scheduling your work differently or > finding the user who is running batch jobs interactively. If you have > programmers who do interactive compiles for instance. The second option > is to purchase additional interactive capacity, which can be very > expensive. There are more than two things to do, one is fast/400 and another is change platforms. Those last two options may not be desireable, however. James Rich
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2026 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.
midrange.com
