Although I prefer SNADS to DDM by a wide margin, remember that a
well-written pair of send/receive programs can give better throughput
than SNADS. SNADS has a lot of error-correction and recovery built
in: "Neither rain nor snow..." your file -will- get to the other
end! But all that protection does come at a price.
Years ago we built ourselves a pair of programs that send a save file
from machine to machine. They're simple send/receive programs, but
have next to no recovery. Our machines are in the same room, so
transmission problems are very few. I suspect that running SNA via
TCP/IP (with its built in error recovery) would give fairly good
protection, but you'd have to start any retransmissions by yourself.
--Paul E Musselman
PaulMmn@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact
[javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.