Re: Why NOT the 400? -- MIDRANGE-L

Subject: Re: Why NOT the 400?
From: "Adam Lang" <aalang@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2003 12:42:19 -0400
List-archive: <http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l>
List-help: <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=help>
List-id: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion <midrange-l.midrange.com>
List-post: <mailto:midrange-l@midrange.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l>,<mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l>,<mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=unsubscribe>

Sound slike Linux. :p
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Finucci Domenico" <Domenico.Finucci@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: "'Midrange Systems Technical Discussion'" <midrange-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Monday, July 28, 2003 10:27 AM
Subject: R: Why NOT the 400?


> IMO, it's very difficult to find robust application that uses both
> environments.
> I suppose nobody will use a windows based environment for hosting
> applications that hold millions and millions of data, in the same time i
> suppose nobody will use a /400 based environment to develop web based
> applications: what the market actually needs is a really strong and useful
> cooperation between these two worlds.
> Sincerely
>
> Domenico Finucci
> Fiditalia , Milano, 02- 4301-2494

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2025 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.