RE: SQL date comparison - a better way? -- MIDRANGE-L

Subject: RE: SQL date comparison - a better way?
From: "Chevalier, Rick" <Rick.Chevalier@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2003 14:59:02 -0500
List-archive: <http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l>
List-help: <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=help>
List-id: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion <midrange-l.midrange.com>
List-post: <mailto:midrange-l@midrange.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l>,<mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l>,<mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=unsubscribe>

I don't know anything about UDF's.  Are these the SQL version of RPG
procedures referenced as functions?

Rick

-----Original Message-----
From: DeLong, Eric [mailto:EDeLong@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Tuesday, August 12, 2003 2:49 PM
To: 'Midrange Systems Technical Discussion'
Subject: RE: SQL date comparison - a better way?

Rick,

Isn't that the sort of thing UDFs are for?  As I recall, a UDF can be used
much like a BIF within a SQL statement.  I haven't tried it, so I may be
wrong in my assumptions... <g> 

Eric DeLong
Sally Beauty Company
MIS-Project Manager (BSG)
940-898-7863 or ext. 1863

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

Follow-Ups:

RE: SQL date comparison - a better way? , rob

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2025 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.