|
Caution Will Robinson! There is a problem with the query manager being introduced by the level 8 database PTF's. A client has been having weird problems ever since his 810 with that code was installed in early July. IBM is not sure why it's happening, but they think they might be close to finding a fix. A formal PTF will be another 2-3 weeks. They put a patch on the system to avoid the situation, but it slows the machine down. Sometimes this problem manifests itself to the point where the job cannot be cancelled, and he must reboot the machine. Recommendation: Wait for the next round of PTF's before upgrading. Paul Nelson Arbor Solutions, Inc. 708-670-6978 Cell pnelson@xxxxxxxxxx rob@xxxxxxxxx Sent by: midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx 08/18/2003 01:52 PM Please respond to Midrange Systems Technical Discussion To: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion <midrange-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx> cc: Subject: Re: SQL Performance in V5R2 Without a doubt ensure that you order the latest cume, hiper group and database group. If you've had the V5R2 cd's laying around for longer than 4 or 5 months, then throw away the cume CD's that came with it and order a new set. For more information on group ptf's http://as400service.rochester.ibm.com/supporthome.nsf/Document/10000031 Rob Berendt -- "They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety." Benjamin Franklin "Bill Freiberg" <bfreiberg@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Sent by: midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx 08/18/2003 01:17 PM Please respond to Midrange Systems Technical Discussion To: midrange-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx cc: Fax to: Subject: SQL Performance in V5R2 One of the things listed in "What's new in V5R2" is a rewrite of the query optimizer to improve SQL / query performance. We are upgrading soon, but being asked now about things we can do to aid in CPU usage and user experience. For those of you that have already gone to V5R2, has there been a noticeable performance improvement? Our apps are VERY SQL intensive to accommodate completely dynamic sorting and filtering, and while our system performance is good (box and index tuning done and reviewed regularly) we are always prodded by our hardware guys to see if we can't get a few more RPMs out of the hamster wheel. Any shared experience would certainly be appreciated. _______________________________________________ This is the Midrange Systems Technical Discussion (MIDRANGE-L) mailing list To post a message email: MIDRANGE-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options, visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l or email: MIDRANGE-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives at http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l. _______________________________________________ This is the Midrange Systems Technical Discussion (MIDRANGE-L) mailing list To post a message email: MIDRANGE-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options, visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l or email: MIDRANGE-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives at http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l.
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.