Re: Why is joblog no complete? -- MIDRANGE-L

Subject: Re: Why is joblog no complete?
From: PaulMmn <PaulMmn@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 9 Sep 2003 23:39:11 -0400
List-archive: <http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l>
List-help: <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=help>
List-id: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion <midrange-l.midrange.com>
List-post: <mailto:midrange-l@midrange.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=unsubscribe>

I remember a problem we had with an earlier version of ASC's source scanner-- it kept failing. We and ASC finally tracked it down to a "line" of source code we had which was more than (?) 99 physical lines! [Don't ask-- I don't remember] They had to change and recompile their module to handle larger lines of source code!

Our motto: "If it works here, it works anywhere!"

--Paul E Musselman
PaulMmn@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.