Even if they decided to support SuSE and Turbo, there are still dozens on
Linux distros that they don't support.  Even if they made it work on every
Linux, it still wouldn't work on the BSDs, Solaris, OS X, etc, etc.

I wish IBM would release these things as open source products!   Then,
none of these compatibilty issues would be a problem.   What does it gain
IBM to make their free software proprietary?   Why limit people if they're
not going to make money on it anyway?

Or were they planning to charge for the Linux versions in the future?


On Wed, 24 Sep 2003, Wills, Mike N. (TC) wrote:
>
> We hadn't tried on any other platform yet, that isn't good that they are
> hard coding it. We where thinking they where developing it for all of their
> supported distros (RedHat, Suse, and Turbo).
>

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Follow-Ups:
Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.