On Thu, 2 Oct 2003, Joe Pluta wrote:

> You seem to be one of those people who think "standards" are good,
> regardless, just because they are standards.  I, on the other hand,
> think a standard is only as good as the business goals it achieves, and
> the current W3C DOM standard achieves none of the goals I need, thus I
> think I won't be using it.

If the standard lacks the functionality, and some other way does provide
that functionality for you, then we are in agreement - use that other way.
I am not interested in standards that hold us back.  However, I am very
interested in developing common goals and methods that allow us to build
on common grounds.  I am interested in having a voice in those goals and
methods.  I feel that the web standards try to fill both those ideals.
Insofar as they fail to meet them I strongly support making changes.  I am
strongly against any standard that requires me to obtain a license or
enter into a contract with any entity.

> Not a single customer of mine uses Netscape as a standard.  Not one.

Mine do.  And not just Netscape but any browser they like.

James Rich

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Follow-Ups:
Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.