|
On Thu, 2 Oct 2003, Joe Pluta wrote: > You seem to be one of those people who think "standards" are good, > regardless, just because they are standards. I, on the other hand, > think a standard is only as good as the business goals it achieves, and > the current W3C DOM standard achieves none of the goals I need, thus I > think I won't be using it. If the standard lacks the functionality, and some other way does provide that functionality for you, then we are in agreement - use that other way. I am not interested in standards that hold us back. However, I am very interested in developing common goals and methods that allow us to build on common grounds. I am interested in having a voice in those goals and methods. I feel that the web standards try to fill both those ideals. Insofar as they fail to meet them I strongly support making changes. I am strongly against any standard that requires me to obtain a license or enter into a contract with any entity. > Not a single customer of mine uses Netscape as a standard. Not one. Mine do. And not just Netscape but any browser they like. James Rich
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.