Re: Commands inside RPG (was RE: authority question....)

["Keith Carpenter" <CarpCon@xxxxxxx>]

Actually it was probably CPF Rel 2.

This was to allow commands to be modified and have these changes still be
effective in programs that were compiled prior to the command modifcation
(assuming they're compatible).



----- Original Message ----- 
From: "jt" <jt@xxxxxx>
To: "Midrange Systems Technical Discussion" <midrange-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Tuesday, October 14, 2003 9:34 AM
Subject: RE: Commands inside RPG (was RE: authority question....)


>
>
> | -----Original Message-----
> | [mailto:midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of Jon Paris
> | Sent: Saturday, October 11, 2003 2:30 PM
>
> | Hate to disillusion you Tom - but "compiled" CL really isn't.
>
> | Very little in CL is really
> | compiled in the sense that RPG is.
>
> Interesting.  Iirc, and I'm pretty sure I do, the 38 CL wasn't like this
> a-TALL.  In fact, docs used to say (and mebbe still do) that one of
> ADVANTAGES of CL over other ordinary job control languages was that it was
> compiled (in true sense of word).  Dunno when that theory changed.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> This is the Midrange Systems Technical Discussion (MIDRANGE-L) mailing
list
> To post a message email: MIDRANGE-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
> visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l
> or email: MIDRANGE-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
> at http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l.
>
>