RE: qstrup cl question/bug

[Vern Hamberg <vhamberg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

That's it exactly - ILE CL has the COPYRIGHT command that puts a copyright 
into the extra information section of the program object, not in the 
executable code, as this technique does.

Vern

At 04:46 PM 11/14/2003 -0500, you wrote:
> Jerry,
>
> I agree that the line of code would never be executed. Since that variable
> &CPYR contains a copyright notice, my guess is that IBM wanted to make sure
> that the copyright notice is present in the compiled program object, and
> that is what the line of code is for.
>
> -Marty
>
> ------------------------------
>
> date: Fri, 14 Nov 2003 13:34:10 -0800
> from: Jerry <jdraper@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> subject:
>
> I did a rtvcfgsrc of qsys/qstrup and can't figure out the end of the code.
> My
> my look it does not appear that the second to last command never runs under
> any
> circumstance as it is pre-empted by the RETURN stmt.  If it does somehow run
> the CHGVAR, what is the point of changing a variable to itself?
>
> Jerry