|
> Wouldn't that data be flowing regardless of whether or not you are using > QPWDVLDPGM? So how does it contribute to the risk? Unless you have an > unscrupulous programmer who wrote QPWDVLDPGM. But then again, if the > values for WRKSYSVAL QPWD* are sufficient for you, then what else is IBM > to do? I was merely clarifying what John Earl had said, since you didn't seem to understand what he meant by "over the wire." I'm not in any way stating that using QPWDVLDPGM makes things more or less secure.
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2025 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.
midrange.com
