|
Eric and all, >> timeslice... It doesn't work the way it used to, so I doubt it really helps much. What has changed to affect the way the system responds to timeslice value changes? >>Are there many access paths that are being rebuilt? Yes, and this is probably the biggest issue as several have pointed out. Restoring from tape might be worth checking into, but why would a restore from tape be faster? When I hear "tape" I automatically think it will be slower. My ignorance is showing, again... I guess the answer is, "well that depends". I am on a model 830 and the tape drive is a 3580-001. >> Do you really need the entire library copied? We do eventually need to be able to trim down and dummy up the test data for Sarbanes-Oxley compliance, and that will reduce the time it takes for the environment data replication. Someone else suggested SAVCHGOBJ from PROD and restore that to the TEST env but due to changes in test/training/development environments we need to start with a fresh copy of all objects. The other suggestion from someone else to do RSTLIB SAVLIB(MYLIB) DEV(TAP69) MBROPT(*ALL) ALWOBJDIF(*ALL) RSTLIB(TESTLIB) would work if happen to need it the day after a full backup is done. Thanks for all comments/suggestions. Steve
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2025 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.