|
>So I started thinking about adding them instead to the QSYSLIBL. Currently, >our QSYSLIBL is still using the default IBM provided QSYS, QSYS2, QHLPSYS, >and QUSRSYS. >But I'm wondering how appropriate that would be. Are there any gotcha's if >I do this? The one that is most likely to bite you is, if you get a new version of the libraries and you want to set up a test environment to check it out, you would need to do some fiddling to remove the old version from the SYSLIBL. Nothing a little CL couldn't solve, but it's still a nuisance. Other gotchas are unpredictable. We put one of our purchased packages into SYSLIBL, then found that the fact that its library contained a file called QCLSRC was causing us problems. Who would have guessed that? PC2
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2025 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.