RE: Auto Tuning -- MIDRANGE-L

Subject: RE: Auto Tuning
From: "Graap, Ken" <keg@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2004 05:44:08 -0800
List-archive: <http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l>
List-help: <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=help>
List-id: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion <midrange-l.midrange.com>
List-post: <mailto:midrange-l@midrange.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=unsubscribe>

So, what would you recommend as an appropriate timeslice setting for batch
and interactive?

Kenneth

-----Original Message-----
From: Clare Holtham [mailto:Clare.Holtham@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Monday, February 02, 2004 10:28 PM
To: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion
Subject: Re: Auto Tuning

Ken,

I think it's just one of those things like having the QINTER timeslice set
to a value more appropriate for a B10, that IBM never gets round to fixing!
And it's why you should, in my opinion, turn off automatic tuning and tune
the system yourself. This is especially true if your applications use SQL!

cheers,

Clare

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

Follow-Ups:

Re: Auto Tuning , Clare Holtham

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2025 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.