Re: 24 x 80 is too small. -- MIDRANGE-L

Subject: Re: 24 x 80 is too small.
From: Douglas Handy <dhandy1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2004 00:06:30 -0500
List-archive: <http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l>
List-help: <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=help>
List-id: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion <midrange-l.midrange.com>
List-post: <mailto:midrange-l@midrange.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=unsubscribe>

Tevor,

>Didn't I say that already?

No, I thought you said that it was block mode which made performance slow.  Or
at least that is how I interpreted your statements.  It would have been slower
yet (possibly quite significantly so) if block mode was not used.

Doug

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2026 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.