RE: Autoreply vs. Operator Intervention on CPF5034 -- MIDRANGE-L

Subject: RE: Autoreply vs. Operator Intervention on CPF5034
From: Kaynor@xxxxxxx
Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2004 12:53:47 EST
List-archive: <http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l>
List-help: <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=help>
List-id: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion <midrange-l.midrange.com>
List-post: <mailto:midrange-l@midrange.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=unsubscribe>

That's it!  Thank you Charles and Chuck.
--Chapin Kaynor


> from: "Chuck Lewis" <clewis@xxxxxxxxxx>
date: Thu, 25 Mar 2004 09:07:10 -0500
S> ubject: RE: Autoreply vs. Operator Intervention on CPF5034
> 
> Chapin,
> 
> If you want to control this for certain circumstances and not all, use a
> Reply List Entry in a CL.
> 
> That way you can control the message option reply, etc.
> 
> HTH
> 
> Chuck


date: Thu, 25 Mar 2004 08:24:20 -0500
from: CWilt@xxxxxxxxxxxx
subject: RE: Autoreply vs. Operator Intervention on CPF5034

Take a look at the INQMSGRPY parameter of the SBMJOB command.

HTH,
Charles

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

Follow-Ups:

RE: Autoreply vs. Operator Intervention on CPF5034 , Chuck Lewis

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.