RE: Ignore *SYSTEM state of objects?? Search 400 article.

[michaelr_41@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx]

I would think that would be an extremely dangerous thing to do. I would
also think that that could be a way to hack a system.

On Tue, 6 Apr 2004 13:10:25 -0500, "Chuck Lewis" <clewis@xxxxxxxxxx>
said:
> I'm not commenting one way or the other as to whether or not that works,
> but
> you had better be pretty careful messing with stuff like that I would
> think.
> 
> YEARS ago we had problems with Control Units acting up, hanging, etc and
> IBM
> Support walked me through resetting things "deep in the system" via
> Service
> Tools and it was something else :-)
> 
> Chuck
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of CWilt@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> Sent: Tuesday, April 06, 2004 12:15 PM
> To: midrange-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Ignore *SYSTEM state of objects?? Search 400 article.
> 
> Is it just me, or does this strike anybody else as being "wrong".  That
> that
> it can't be done, but that it shouldn't.
> 
> http://search400.techtarget.com/tip/0,289483,sid3_gci958399,00.html?track=NL
> -177&ad=479700
> 
> Anybody with more experience in this area care to comment?
> 
> Thanks,
> Charles
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> This is the Midrange Systems Technical Discussion (MIDRANGE-L) mailing
> list
> To post a message email: MIDRANGE-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
> visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l
> or email: MIDRANGE-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
> at http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l.
> 
-- 
  
  michaelr_41@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

-- 
http://www.fastmail.fm - And now for something completely different?