|
> CHGSYSVAL should be locked down and not available for public use. I'm honestly shocked that it ISN'T shipped *PUBLIC *EXCLUDE. (I never looked!) > Imagine a situation where someone changes the security level from 30 to > 50, because they think it is "enhanced" and better? It happens... Well, to tie this into another thread, unless you're using programs that contain non-Sec50-friendly hacks, or you've got a system that's completely isolated from the outside world and running well beyond design capacity, Sec50 IS better than Sec30, and I'd be more worried about somebody going the other way! -- JHHL
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2025 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.
midrange.com
