> As an aside, my experience is that changing the image size tends to
> cause fuzziness.  It is very important that the Client Access window be
> as close to the final document size as possible.  It is very difficult
> for an image editor to change the size of letters and lines without
> fuzziness.

Actually, that's not strictly true. Images can scale reasonably well,
retaining sharpness and avoiding jaggies, whenever either (a) you have a
SMALL WHOLE NUMBER scaling ratio (e.g., 1:2, 2:1, 1:3, 3:1, 1:4, 4:1), or
(b) you have a bitmap manipulation program with a fairly sophisticated
scaling engine (e.g., GIMP or PhotoSlop). Note, however, that if you're
enlarging an image, you're better off with both a small-whole-number ratio
AND a sophisticated scaling engine, if you want to avoid jaggies.

You also want to adjust resolution and size for your final output: if you
optimize it for onscreen display, it'll look coarse on a high resolution
printer; if you optimize it for printing, you could end up looking
terrible on the screen, and if your printer isn't at least 1000dpi, you'll
have tradeoffs between halftone screen size and number of gray levels.

--
JHHL



As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.