Frances Denoncourt wrote:

> How does being in different activation groups
> affect accessing the same file in the same
> submitted job?

A submitted job is a new job.  No two jobs share a single activation
group.  Think of an activation group as a subset of a single job, so
you could have 10 jobs all running in their own separate activation
group A.  If it helps any, think of an activation group as being
qualified by the job, so rather than think of AG(A), think of it as
713037/BUCK/QPADEV0001/A.

> In the future: If these were interactive jobs and we
> bounced around through the OPM programs in the
> menu system and occasionally got to ILE programs
> that were in their own activation group and accessed
> the same files (same logicals), would I be creating a mess?

I can't speak for the specifics of your programs, but I have mixed OPM
and ILE and do not have any issues with updates.  I _would_ caution
you to call your 'gateway' CL programs (the ones in *NEW) and don't
call the RPG programs (the ones in *CALLER) directly, or your service
programs will end up running in the default AG, and that would be
ugly.

I didn't see any mention of commitment control, so I guess it's safe
enough to presume that you don't have CC on these files?
  --buck




As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2025 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.