Re: SQL vs. traditional I/O? -- MIDRANGE-L

Subject: Re: SQL vs. traditional I/O?
From: "Mark S. Waterbury" <mark.s.waterbury@xxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 22 Jul 2004 21:50:46 -0600
List-archive: <http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l>
List-help: <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=help>
List-id: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion <midrange-l.midrange.com>
List-post: <mailto:midrange-l@midrange.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=unsubscribe>

Hi, all:

Here's a "radical" idea -- would it not be "cool" if IBM could make the
embedded SQL pre-processor "smart enough" to recognize when you are doing
"single row at a time" types of things, and under the covers, actually
generate "native" I/O? ;-)

Mark S. Waterbury

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2025 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.