RE: SQL vs. traditional I/O?

["Bob Cagle" <bcagle@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

That I definitely do not understand - why define the tables with SQL
when DDS works?  With SQL defined tables, don't you lose some of the
visibility of the definition itself - namely the DDS?

Bob Cagle

-----Original Message-----
From: rob@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:rob@xxxxxxxxx] 
Sent: Thursday, July 22, 2004 2:52 PM
To: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion
Subject: Re: SQL vs. traditional I/O?



A tangential argument is defining data with SQL versus DDS.

Rob Berendt
--
Group Dekko Services, LLC
Dept 01.073
PO Box 2000
Dock 108
6928N 400E
Kendallville, IN 46755
http://www.dekko.com



--
This is the Midrange Systems Technical Discussion (MIDRANGE-L) mailing
list
To post a message email: MIDRANGE-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l
or email: MIDRANGE-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
at http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l.